Over 20 Common Complaints about the Onewheel Pint

We’ve moved! Check out our FULL article here. Summary below.

The Onewheel Pint, despite its impressive refinement and cost-effectiveness, has garnered some common criticisms. While it excels in many aspects, it’s not without flaws. Here’s a quick rundown of the most frequent grievances:

1. Bluetooth Connection: The persisting issue with unreliable Bluetooth connections affects riders who track their journeys on the Onewheel app, potentially disrupting their streaks and data logging.
2. Strong Pushback: Some users find the strong pushback a hindrance, while others see it as a necessary safety feature. Improved warnings for potential nosedives are suggested.
3. Affordable Yet High Quality: The Pint’s affordability doesn’t compromise its quality or finish, disproving the “did you make that?” notion.
4. Cost: At $950, plus additional accessories and safety gear, the price exceeds $1,000. However, compared to other electric skateboards and unicycles, it’s reasonable for its performance.
5. Size: The Pint’s smaller size suits many riders who appreciate its agility, even if their feet hang off the edges.
6. Top Speed: The Pint doesn’t prioritize speed; it’s a quick and nimble ride, with pushback at 15 mph.
7. Plastic Footpad: The wooden footplates are more aesthetic than functional, as the Onewheel doesn’t flex.
8. Simple Stop: It’s designed for beginners; advanced riders can deactivate it.
9. Stability: Some view the Pint as less stable, while others appreciate its nimbleness and maneuverability.
10. Charge Time: The standard 2-3 hour charge time is in line with similar personal electric mobility devices.
11. Range: The Pint delivers on its 6-8 miles advertised range, and some users achieve even more.
12. Missing Front Hand Grip: The mag handle replaces the front grip, emphasizing innovation over tradition.
13. Custom Shaping: Custom shaping options might be introduced for the Pint in the future.
14. Air Travel: The Pint’s compatibility with air travel depends on TSA and individual airlines’ discretion due to past issues with hoverboard batteries.
15. Not an XR: The Pint has its differences in size, speed, and range but offers affordability.
16. Accessories: Some find Future Motion’s accessories subpar and overpriced.
17. Off-Road Capability: The Pint isn’t suitable for off-road adventures.
18. Inadequate Light: Users feel the built-in light isn’t bright enough.
19. Ground Clearance: Despite the smaller wheel, the shorter length maintains similar ground clearance.
20. Easier Rolling on Dismount: The rounded edge of the Pint’s wheel can lead to easier rolling during dismounts.
21. Lock Compatibility: U-locks used for XR or Plus models might not fit the Pint due to the new design. Cable locks work but are less secure.

In summary, while the Onewheel Pint has its drawbacks, it offers an impressive package of performance and cost-effectiveness, with some criticisms largely dependent on personal preferences.

Keep reading our FULL article here.